{"id":124,"date":"2026-07-18T15:02:45","date_gmt":"2026-07-18T15:02:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/?p=124"},"modified":"2026-07-18T15:02:46","modified_gmt":"2026-07-18T15:02:46","slug":"why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Your Neobank Keeps Freezing Accounts: What Five Regulators Actually Found"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"bs-article\"><p class=\"bs-dek\">Not a Reddit theory about an overworked compliance team. Five separate regulators, in four countries, have put exact numbers on why your account sits in a queue for weeks with no explanation.<\/p> <p>Monzo let customers open accounts using addresses like Buckingham Palace. That&#8217;s not a joke from a forum thread, it&#8217;s a direct quote from the UK&#8217;s Financial Conduct Authority, in the official notice that fined Monzo \u00a321 million.<\/p> <p><strong>Your frozen account almost certainly isn&#8217;t personal. It&#8217;s the downstream effect of a documented pattern across the industry: major neobanks have been caught, repeatedly and with exact fines attached, running compliance systems too thin for the customer base they built. The FCA fined Monzo \u00a321.09 million (July 2025) and Starling \u00a328.96 million (October 2024), confirmed directly on the regulator&#8217;s own site. Financial trade press widely reports Revolut was fined \u20ac3.5 million by the Bank of Lithuania (April 2025) and N26 was fined \u20ac4.25 million and \u20ac9.2 million by BaFin (2021 and 2024), figures this article couldn&#8217;t independently verify on the regulators&#8217; own pages. Wise is reportedly under active criminal investigation in Belgium over more than \u20ac500 million in suspicious transactions. None of this means your money is at risk. It means the review queue you&#8217;re stuck in is real, industry-wide, and now has fines and investigations attached to it.<\/strong><\/p> <div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/#The_pattern_with_the_exact_numbers\" >The pattern, with the exact numbers<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/#Growth_outran_compliance_at_every_single_one_of_them\" >Growth outran compliance at every single one of them<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/#Why_breaching_a_restriction_is_worse_than_the_original_problem\" >Why breaching a restriction is worse than the original problem<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/#What_this_changes_about_what_to_actually_do\" >What this changes about what to actually do<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/why-neobanks-freeze-accounts-regulator-fines\/#FAQ\" >FAQ<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_pattern_with_the_exact_numbers\"><\/span>The pattern, with the exact numbers<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2> <div class=\"bs-table\"><table> <thead><tr><th>Provider<\/th><th>Regulator<\/th><th>Fine (\u2b50 = confirmed directly on regulator&#8217;s site; other rows via trade press, regulator&#8217;s own page not directly accessible)<\/th><th>What was actually found<\/th><\/tr><\/thead> <tbody> <tr class=\"is-avoid\"><th>Monzo \u2b50<\/th><td>FCA (UK), 8 July 2025<\/td><td><strong>\u00a321,091,300<\/strong> (reduced from \u00a330,130,475 for early resolution)<\/td><td>Weak onboarding, risk assessment and transaction monitoring, October 2018 to August 2020. Then breached an FCA order banning new high-risk accounts, opening <strong>34,000+ accounts anyway<\/strong> between August 2020 and June 2022. Some addresses accepted: well-known London landmarks.<\/td><\/tr> <tr class=\"is-avoid\"><th>Starling \u2b50<\/th><td>FCA (UK), 2 October 2024<\/td><td><strong>\u00a328,959,426<\/strong> (reduced from \u00a340,959,426)<\/td><td>Automated sanctions screening covered only &#8220;a fraction&#8221; of the full sanctions list from 2017 until Starling caught it in January 2023. Separately breached a high-risk-onboarding ban, opening <strong>54,000+ accounts for 49,000 high-risk customers<\/strong>, September 2021 to November 2023.<\/td><\/tr> <tr class=\"is-avoid\"><th>Revolut<\/th><td>Bank of Lithuania, reportedly 8 April 2025<\/td><td>Reportedly <strong>\u20ac3.5 million<\/strong>, described as the largest AML fine in Lithuanian history<\/td><td>Reportedly: shortcomings in monitoring business relationships and customer transactions, meaning suspicious activity wasn&#8217;t always correctly flagged. Separately, trade press citing Lithuania&#8217;s Financial Crime Investigation Service says Revolut generates roughly <strong>80% of all suspicious-activity reports<\/strong> filed in the entire country.<\/td><\/tr> <tr class=\"is-avoid\"><th>N26<\/th><td>BaFin (Germany), reportedly 2021 and May 2024<\/td><td>Reportedly <strong>\u20ac4.25 million<\/strong> (2021) plus <strong>\u20ac9.2 million<\/strong> (2024)<\/td><td>Reportedly: repeatedly late suspicious-activity-report filings, first for 2019-2020, then again throughout 2022 despite the first fine. BaFin reportedly appointed a special compliance monitor, said to be only its second such appointment ever. Trade press reports that in December 2025, N26 was also blocked from issuing new mortgages in the Netherlands over AML concerns.<\/td><\/tr> <tr><th>Wise<\/th><td>Belgian prosecutors (ongoing); US state regulators + CFPB, reportedly 2025<\/td><td><strong>$4.2 million<\/strong> multi-state US fine, reported by American Banker and confirmed via the NY Department of Financial Services&#8217; own press release; CFPB penalty reportedly cut from $2.025M to $44,955; Belgian case value under review, reportedly <strong>&gt;\u20ac500 million<\/strong><\/td><td>US (confirmed via dfs.ny.gov): Bank Secrecy Act\/AML deficiencies, July 2022 to September 2023. Belgium (trade press only): criminal investigation into &#8220;lack of proper identification of clients and their activities,&#8221; tied to hundreds of cross-border requests from 30+ countries, reportedly nearing a formal court summons. A 2024 Belgian review had already reportedly found missing proof-of-address for hundreds of thousands of customers.<\/td><\/tr> <\/tbody> <\/table><\/div> <p class=\"bs-table-foot\">Fonti: fca.org.uk (comunicati ufficiali Monzo e Starling, letti direttamente), lb.lt\/Bank of Lithuania (via amlwatcher.com, kyc360.com, fintech.global, fetch diretto bloccato), bafin.de (via finextra.com, bankingdive.com, amlintelligence.com, fetch diretto bloccato), americanbanker.com + euronews.com + bankingdive.com + dfs.ny.gov (azione Wise USA\/Belgio). Verificato 2026-07-17.<\/p> <div class=\"bs-callout\"><span class=\"bs-callout-label\">In breve<\/span> <p>Every fine on this list follows the same shape: rapid customer growth, a compliance system that didn&#8217;t scale with it, a regulator restriction imposed to force a fix, and then, in three of the five cases, the neobank breaching its own restriction anyway. The freeze you&#8217;re sitting in is what &#8220;fixing it&#8221; looks like from the customer&#8217;s side: more caution, more manual review, applied to far more accounts than are actually risky.<\/p><\/div> <h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Growth_outran_compliance_at_every_single_one_of_them\"><\/span>Growth outran compliance at every single one of them<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2> <p>The regulator notices all describe the same mechanism in different words. Monzo grew from about 600,000 customers in 2018 to 5.8 million by 2022. Starling grew from roughly 43,000 customers in 2017 to 3.6 million by 2023. Revolut now serves 57 million customers across the EEA, which its own analysts point to as the reason it generates more suspicious-activity reports than any other bank licensed in Lithuania, &#8220;tens of times more&#8221; by volume, according to reporting on the FNTT figures.<\/p> <p>None of that growth is illegal, and none of it means the money in your account is unsafe. What it means is that the transaction-monitoring team reviewing your flagged payment is very likely working through a backlog that a regulator has already confirmed exists, not personally deciding your case doesn&#8217;t matter.<\/p> <blockquote>false-positive rate hovered around ~40%&#8230; queue never below 3 months backlog<span class=\"bs-quote-who\">One former Revolut insider describing the review queue, r\/Revolut<\/span><\/blockquote> <p>That specific number comes from an anonymous account and can&#8217;t be verified the way the fines above can, so treat it as color, not data. What can be verified: FCA Director Therese Chambers&#8217;s own words about Monzo&#8217;s onboarding, &#8220;based on limited, and in some cases, obviously implausible information.&#8221; Regulators aren&#8217;t describing a rare failure. They&#8217;re describing a business model that, at scale, several major providers got caught running with too few people checking the front door.<\/p> <h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_breaching_a_restriction_is_worse_than_the_original_problem\"><\/span>Why breaching a restriction is worse than the original problem<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2> <p>The detail that gets missed in most coverage of these fines: Monzo and Starling weren&#8217;t just fined for weak controls. They were fined for <strong>continuing to onboard high-risk customers after regulators explicitly ordered them to stop<\/strong>. Monzo kept going for nearly two years, Starling for more than two years. That&#8217;s not a monitoring gap, it&#8217;s a restriction a regulator imposed specifically to force better filtering, being ignored while the backlog of un-reviewed accounts kept growing underneath it.<\/p> <p>That history matters for anyone frozen right now. Once a regulator has forced a provider into &#8220;we must catch everything we previously missed&#8221; mode, backdated to years of onboarding, the review queue doesn&#8217;t just process new flags. It works through a legacy backlog too. A freeze today can be a side effect of a provider still digging out from a restriction imposed months or years earlier.<\/p> <h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_this_changes_about_what_to_actually_do\"><\/span>What this changes about what to actually do<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2> <p>Nothing here changes the practical steps for getting a frozen account unstuck: documents first, formal written complaint if support stalls, then <a href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/escalate-frozen-account-financial-ombudsman\/\">escalate to the Financial Ombudsman if the firm goes quiet<\/a>, a route covered step by step in <a href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/revolut-account-frozen-what-to-do\/\">what to do when Revolut freezes your account<\/a>. What it changes is how to read the silence while you wait.<\/p> <ul class=\"bs-checklist\"> <li><span class=\"bs-checklist-box\">\u2713<\/span><p>A freeze with no explanation is <strong>the industry norm, confirmed by regulators<\/strong>, not a sign your specific account was targeted or your money is at risk.<\/p><\/li> <li><span class=\"bs-checklist-box\">\u2713<\/span><p>If your provider has a recent AML fine or a regulator-imposed restriction (check this table), your review may be sitting inside a larger, regulator-mandated backlog clearance, which can run longer than a routine flag.<\/p><\/li> <li><span class=\"bs-checklist-box\">\u2713<\/span><p>Complete, unambiguous documents are the fastest lever you control. Monzo and Starling&#8217;s fines both cite implausible or incomplete customer information as part of what went wrong, so give the review nothing to hesitate over.<\/p><\/li> <li><span class=\"bs-checklist-box\">\u2713<\/span><p>Never keep 100% of your funds or income routed through a single provider. Every name on this table is a large, well-funded institution that still got caught under-resourcing the exact system standing between you and your money this week.<\/p><\/li> <\/ul> <p>None of these five providers is uniquely bad. They&#8217;re the five that got caught and fined with a number attached, which is different from being the five worst, smaller providers with less regulatory attention may have identical problems with no public fine to show for it. The honest reading of this table isn&#8217;t &#8220;avoid these five.&#8221; It&#8217;s &#8220;assume this risk exists everywhere at this scale, and build a setup that survives any one of them freezing you.&#8221;<\/p> <h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FAQ\"><\/span>FAQ<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><div class=\"bs-faq\"><details><summary>Does a neobank fine mean my money is unsafe?<span class=\"bs-faq-pm\"><span class=\"plus\">+<\/span><span class=\"minus\">\u2013<\/span><\/span><\/summary><p class=\"bs-faq-a\">No. Every fine here is about anti-money-laundering process failures, weak onboarding checks, late suspicious-activity reports, incomplete sanctions screening, not about the institution losing customer money or being insolvent. Deposit protection (FSCS in the UK, national schemes in the EU) is a separate system and isn&#8217;t affected by these fines, covered in more detail in <a href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/is-your-money-safe-neobank-frozen-fscs\/\">is your money safe if a neobank freezes it?<\/a><\/p><\/details><details><summary>Is Revolut worse than the others because it generates the most suspicious-activity reports in Lithuania?<span class=\"bs-faq-pm\"><span class=\"plus\">+<\/span><span class=\"minus\">\u2013<\/span><\/span><\/summary><p class=\"bs-faq-a\">Not necessarily. Revolut&#8217;s 57 million EEA customers are far more than any other bank licensed there, so a proportionally similar report volume would still be an outsized share of the country&#8217;s total. The Bank of Lithuania&#8217;s reported fine was about monitoring quality, not raw volume, and its size (reportedly \u20ac3.5 million) is smaller than the FCA fines directly confirmed against Monzo or Starling.<\/p><\/details><details><summary>Which of these five has the worst record?<span class=\"bs-faq-pm\"><span class=\"plus\">+<\/span><span class=\"minus\">\u2013<\/span><\/span><\/summary><p class=\"bs-faq-a\">By total fines, N26 stands out for reportedly being sanctioned twice for the same underlying issue (2021 and 2024) and getting a special compliance monitor, which trade press coverage describes as a rare step for BaFin, reportedly used only once before (on Deutsche Bank, in an unrelated 2018 order), though none of this is confirmed directly on BaFin&#8217;s own site. By fine size, Starling&#8217;s confirmed \u00a328.96 million and Monzo&#8217;s confirmed \u00a321.09 million are the largest. Wise&#8217;s situation is different in kind: an active criminal investigation, not yet a fine, so its outcome isn&#8217;t decided.<\/p><\/details><details><summary>Should I close my account with one of these providers?<span class=\"bs-faq-pm\"><span class=\"plus\">+<\/span><span class=\"minus\">\u2013<\/span><\/span><\/summary><p class=\"bs-faq-a\">Not automatically. All five remain licensed and operating, and the fines are the result of regulators forcing improvements, not evidence the improvements failed. The practical response is the one every case here points to: don&#8217;t make any single provider, including these five, the only place your money can be reached.<\/p><\/details><details><summary>Why does it feel like nobody at the company can explain what&#8217;s happening?<span class=\"bs-faq-pm\"><span class=\"plus\">+<\/span><span class=\"minus\">\u2013<\/span><\/span><\/summary><p class=\"bs-faq-a\">Partly law (in the UK, &#8220;tipping off&#8221; someone about a live Suspicious Activity Report is a criminal offence under POCA 2002, covered in detail <a href=\"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/revolut-account-frozen-what-to-do\/\">here<\/a>), and partly the scale problem this article covers: frontline support at a bank processing tens of thousands of backlog reviews genuinely may not have visibility into where your case sits in the queue.<\/p><\/details><\/div><hr \/> <p><em>Written by Daniel Hart, who covers neobanks, account freezes and cross-border banking for neobankfit. Based on official FCA press releases (Monzo, Starling, read directly), Bank of Lithuania and BaFin sanctions reporting via financial trade press (Finextra, AML Intelligence, Banking Dive, KYC360), and reporting on Wise&#8217;s ongoing Belgian investigation and US state settlement (American Banker, Euronews, NY Department of Financial Services).<\/em><\/p> <p><em>This article is general information, not legal or financial advice. Regulatory findings, fine amounts and investigation outcomes can be appealed, revised or updated after publication. For your specific situation, check current provider terms and consider a qualified adviser.<\/em><\/p><\/div><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Does a neobank fine mean my money is unsafe?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"No. Every fine here is about anti-money-laundering process failures, weak onboarding checks, late suspicious-activity reports, incomplete sanctions screening, not about the institution losing customer money or being insolvent. Deposit protection (FSCS in the UK, national schemes in the EU) is a separate system and isn't affected by these fines, covered in more detail in is your money safe if a neobank freezes it?\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Is Revolut worse than the others because it generates the most suspicious-activity reports in Lithuania?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Not necessarily. Revolut's 57 million EEA customers are far more than any other bank licensed there, so a proportionally similar report volume would still be an outsized share of the country's total. The Bank of Lithuania's reported fine was about monitoring quality, not raw volume, and its size (reportedly \u20ac3.5 million) is smaller than the FCA fines directly confirmed against Monzo or Starling.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Which of these five has the worst record?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"By total fines, N26 stands out for reportedly being sanctioned twice for the same underlying issue (2021 and 2024) and getting a special compliance monitor, which trade press coverage describes as a rare step for BaFin, reportedly used only once before (on Deutsche Bank, in an unrelated 2018 order), though none of this is confirmed directly on BaFin's own site. By fine size, Starling's confirmed \u00a328.96 million and Monzo's confirmed \u00a321.09 million are the largest. Wise's situation is different in kind: an active criminal investigation, not yet a fine, so its outcome isn't decided.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Should I close my account with one of these providers?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Not automatically. All five remain licensed and operating, and the fines are the result of regulators forcing improvements, not evidence the improvements failed. The practical response is the one every case here points to: don't make any single provider, including these five, the only place your money can be reached.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Why does it feel like nobody at the company can explain what's happening?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Partly law (in the UK, \\\"tipping off\\\" someone about a live Suspicious Activity Report is a criminal offence under POCA 2002, covered in detail here), and partly the scale problem this article covers: frontline support at a bank processing tens of thousands of backlog reviews genuinely may not have visibility into where your case sits in the queue.\"}}]}<\/script>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Regulators in the UK, Germany, Lithuania and Belgium have all fined or investigated a major neobank for the same underlying failure. Here&#8217;s what they actually found, with the exact numbers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","rank_math_title":"Why Neobanks Freeze Accounts: What Regulators Found","rank_math_description":"Regulators in the UK, Germany, Lithuania and Belgium have all fined or investigated a major neobank for the same underlying failure. Here's what they actually found, with the exact numbers.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"why does my neobank freeze my account","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-frozen-accounts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":139,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions\/139"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neobankfit.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}